Connect with us

U.S.

Crowds Flee Times Square After Mistaking Motorcycles Backfiring for Gunshots

Published

on

  • Footage on social media shows crowds of people fleeing from Times Square on Tuesday after believing they were in the midst of an active shooting.
  • New York police officials said that the crowds mistook the sounds of motorcycles backfiring for gunshots.
  • Tensions are high across the nation after a weekend of mass shootings left at least 31 dead. 
  • The same day as the Times Square incident, shoppers at a Louisiana Walmart experienced their own shooting scare, and a falling sign in a Utah mall sent others running for safety. The following day a mistaken report of a person with a gun at a USA Today office in Virginia sparked a building evacuation.

Times Square Shooting Scare 

After a weekend of mass shootings in the United States, residents in cities all over the country are on edge.

Several videos captured Tuesday night in Times Square show crowds of people running and screaming after hearing what they thought were gunshots.

However, after receiving several 911 calls, New York authorities quickly tweeted, “There is no #ActiveShooter in #TimesSquare.” According to authorities, the sound people heard was actually just motorcycles backfiring. 

Still, the threat felt entirely real for those at the scene and the experience has left the community shaken. Panic set in as stampedes of people climbing over each other moved through the area. Many were screaming and crying in fear, and several briefly became separated from loved ones.

Surveillance footage from inside a Junior’s Cheesecake in Midtown showed guests diving to the ground for cover. 

People Share Their Stories Online

The incident forced several stores to lock their doors. That night’s Broadway performance of To Kill a Mockingbird at the Shubert Theater also came to an early end. Celia Kennan-Bolger, who plays Scout Finch in the production, tweeted that she was giving her last speech in the play when people outside tried to get into the theater.

“This was terrifying for the audience who heard screaming & banging on the doors, so they hid or ran & tried to flee. It was terrifying for us because we didn’t know what was happening or what to do.” 

Other social media users in the area tweeted about their experiences as well. Many described their emotions along with what they did to try and survive. 

The number of people who were injured in the commotion is unclear, though local authorities told NBC New York that the amount is up to 20. The station reported that most who were injured refused medical attention and added that less than six went to the hospital for minor injuries. 

New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio also tweeted about the scare, saying “the panic and fear people felt tonight was all too real. Nobody should have to live in constant fear of gun violence. NOBODY.”

Other Recent Scares

The fear of mass shootings in public spaces has felt more real than ever for many across the nation.

The same day as the scare in New York, shoppers inside of a Louisiana Walmart feared they were in the center of a shooting. At least one person was injured while fleeing the area, the local sheriff’s office told WVLA of Baton Rouge. 

The East Baton Rouge Sheriff’s Office said that there was an initial report of two men shooting, but it appeared there was an altercation between two men where a handgun may have been seen.

“When customers saw the handgun, panic set in, and customers were running and screaming while trying to exit the store,” the sheriff’s office said. “Given the recent events in El Paso and Dayton, and given the initial information we received via 911 calls and witnesses exiting the store, we responded with what we feel is appropriate.”

Another false alarm shook West Valley City, Utah on Tuesday night when a shopping mall was evacuated. Shoppers at the Valley Fair Mall panicked after hearing a loud sound that they also mistook for gunfire. 

However, local police explained that there was no active shooter in a tweet. “People heard a loud bang which was actually the sound of a sign falling,” authorities said. “There is no danger. No one is hurt.” 

USA Today‘s headquarters in McLean, Virginia was also evacuated Wednesday morning after what authorities said turned out to be a mistaken report of a person with a weapon at the suburban Washington office.

Tensions are high after the two recent shootings that hit Texas and Ohio. A gunman opened fire at a crowded Walmart in El Paso on Saturday, killing at least 22 and wounding more than 20 others. The following day, another shooter in Dayton, Ohio opened fire in an entertainment district, killing 9 and wounding several others.

Editor’s Note: At Rogue Rocket, we make it a point to not include the names and pictures of mass murderers or suspected mass murderers who may have been seeking attention or infamy. Therefore, we will not be linking to other sources, as they may contain these details.

U.S.

SCOTUS Rules in Favor of Police in Two Qualified Immunity Cases

Published

on

The move further solidifies the contentious legal doctrine that protects officers who commit alleged constitutional violations.


SCOTUS Hears Qualified Immunity Cases 

The Supreme Court on Monday ruled in favor of police in two separate cases involving qualified immunity, the controversial legal doctrine that shields officers accused of violating constitutional rights from lawsuits.

The topic has become a major flashpoint in debates over police reform and curbing police violence since the protests against racial injustice and police brutality in the summer of 2020.

On one side, supporters of qualified immunity claim it is necessary to ensure that police can do their jobs without worrying about frivolous lawsuits. 

However, opponents argue that judicial interpretations of the doctrine over time have given police incredibly broad legal immunity for misconduct and use of excessive force. Under a previous Supreme Court ruling, in order for officers to be held liable, plaintiffs have to show that they violated rights “clearly established” by a previous ruling.

In other words, officers cannot be held liable unless there is another case that involves almost identical circumstances.

As a result, many argue the doctrine creates a Catch-22: Officers are shielded from liability because there is no past precedent, but the reason there is no past precedent is because officers are shielded from liability in the first place.

An Ongoing Debate

Critics argue that the two cases the Supreme Court saw Monday illustrate that double bind, as both involved accusations of excessive force commonly levied against police.

In one case, officers used non-lethal bean bag rounds against a suspect and knelt on his back to subdue him. In the other, police shot and killed a suspect after he threatened them with a hammer.

The justices overturned both lower-court rulings without ordering full briefing and argument because of the lack of precedent. The court issued the decisions in unsigned orders with no dissent, signaling they did not even see the cases as close calls. 

Advocates for qualified immunity claim the decisions signal that the current Supreme Court is not open to changing qualified immunity, and the most likely path for opponents of the doctrine is legislation.

While Democrats in Congress have made numerous efforts to limit qualified immunity, including most recently in the George Floyd Justice In Policing Act passed by the House earlier this year, all those attempts have been blocked by Republicans.

At the state level, dozens of bills have been killed after heavy lobbying from police unions. As a result, it remains unclear what path proponents for reform have at this juncture.

See what others are saying: (NPR) (The New York Times) (The Washington Post)

Continue Reading

U.S.

Florida School Says Students Vaccinated Against COVID-19 Must Stay Home for 30 Days

Published

on

The school falsely claimed that people who have just been vaccinated risk “shedding” the coronavirus and could infect others.


Centner Academy Vaccination Policy

A private school in Florida is now requiring all students who get vaccinated against COVID-19 to quarantine for 30 days before returning to class.

According to the local Miami outlet WSVN, Centner Academy wrote a letter to parents last week describing COVID vaccines as “experimental” and citing anti-vaccine misinformation.

“If you are considering the vaccine for your Centner Academy student(s), we ask that you hold off until the Summer when there will be time for the potential transmission or shedding onto others to decrease,” the letter reportedly stated.

“Because of the potential impact on other students and our school community, vaccinated students will need to stay at home for 30 days post-vaccination for each dose and booster they receive and may return to school after 30 days as long as the student is healthy and symptom-free.”

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has debunked the false claim that those newly vaccinated against COVID-19 can “shed” the virus.

According to the agency’s COVID myths page, vaccine shedding “can only occur when a vaccine contains a weakened version of the virus,” but “none of the authorized COVID-19 vaccines in the United States contain the live virus that causes COVID-19. This means that a COVID-19 vaccine cannot make you sick with COVID-19.”

In fact, early research has suggested that vaccinated people are less likely to spread the virus than unvaccinated people.

Beyond that, unvaccinated people are more likely to spread COVID in general because they are much more likely to get the virus than vaccinated people. According to recently published CDC data, as of August, unvaccinated people were six times more likely to get COVID than vaccinated people and 11 times more likely to die from the virus.

Centner Academy Continues Spread of Misinformation

In a statement to The Washington Post Monday, Centner Academy co-founder David Centner doubled down on the school’s new policy, which he described as a “precautionary measure” based on “numerous anecdotal cases that have been in circulation.”

“The school is not opining as to whether unexplained phenomena have a basis in fact, however we prefer to err on the side of caution when making decisions that impact the health of the school community,” he added.

The new rule echoes similar efforts Centner Academy has made that run counter to public health guidance and scientific knowledge.

In April, the school made headlines when its leadership told vaccinated school employees that they were not allowed to be in contact with any students “until more information is known” and encouraged employees to wait until summer to get the jab.

According to The New York Times, the following week, a math and science teacher allegedly told students not to hug their vaccinated parents for more than five seconds.

The outlet also reported that the school’s other co-founder, Leila Centner, discouraged masking, but when state health officials came for routine inspections, teachers said they were directed in a WhatsApp group to put masks on.

See what others are saying: (WSVN) (The Washington Post) (Business Insider)

Continue Reading

U.S.

Katie Couric Says She Edited Ruth Bader Ginsburg Quote About Athletes Kneeling During National Anthem

Published

on

Couric said she omitted part of a 2016 interview in order to “protect” the justice.


Kate Couric Edited Quote From Justice Ginsburg

In her upcoming book, journalist Katie Couric admitted to editing a quote from Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg in 2016 in order to “protect” Ginsberg from potential criticism. 

Couric interviewed the late justice for an article in Yahoo News. During their discussion, she asked Ginsburg about her thoughts on athletes like Colin Kaepernick kneeling for the national anthem to protest racial inequality.

“I think it’s really dumb of them,” Ginsburg is quoted saying in the piece. “Would I arrest them for doing it? No. I think it’s dumb and disrespectful. I would have the same answer if you asked me about flag burning. I think it’s a terrible thing to do, but I wouldn’t lock a person up for doing it. I would point out how ridiculous it seems to me to do such an act.”

According to The Daily Mail and The New York Post, which obtained advance copies of Couric’s book “Going There,” there was more to Ginsburg’s response. Couric wrote that she omitted a portion where Ginsburg said the form of protest showed a “contempt for a government that has made it possible for their parents and grandparents to live a decent life…Which they probably could not have lived in the places they came from.

Couric Says She Lost Sleep Making Choice

“As they became older they realize that this was youthful folly,” Ginsberg reportedly continued. “And that’s why education is important.

According to The Daily Mail, Couric wrote that the Supreme Court’s head of public affairs sent an email asking to remove comments about kneeling because Ginsburg had misspoken. Couric reportedly added that she felt a need to “protect” the justice, thinking she may not have understood the question. Couric reached out to her friend, New York Times reporter David Brooks, regarding the matter and he allegedly likewise believed she may have been confused by the subject. 

Couric also wrote that she was a “big RBG fan” and felt her comments were “unworthy of a crusader for equality.” Because she knew the remarks could land Ginsburg in hot water, she said she “lost a lot of sleep” and felt “conflicted” about whether or not to edit them out. 

Couric was trending on Twitter Wednesday and Thursday as people questioned the ethics behind her choice to ultimately cut part of the quote. Some thought the move showed a lack of journalistic integrity while others thought revealing the story now harmed Ginsburg’s legacy.

See what others are saying: (New York Post) (The Daily Mail) (Insider)

Continue Reading