Connect with us

U.S.

Heroes From the Mass Shootings in Dayton and El Paso

Published

on

  • Numerous stories of heroes have come out in the wake of mass shootings in El Paso, Texas, and Dayton, Ohio.
  • Those being hailed as heroes in El Paso include a soldier who grabbed several children in a playpen and moved them to safety, as well as a young mother and father who died protecting their child.
  • In Dayton, the police officers who stopped the shooter in 30 seconds are among those who have been praised as heroes.

Heroes From El Paso 

Stories of heroes have begun to emerge in the days since two separate mass shootings in El Paso, Texas, and Dayton, Ohio left 31 dead and dozens more injured.

On Saturday morning, a man opened fire on a Walmart near the Cielo Vista Mall in El Paso killing 22 people and injuring at least 24 others. According to reports from the El Paso police, authorities began receiving calls about an active shooter around 10:30 a.m.

Eyewitnesses said the shooter fired at people in the parking lot before entering the building. Police reportedly responded to the shooting in six minutes, and the shooter surrendered shortly after without incident, or without the police firing any shots.

One of the most widely circulated stories from El Paso was that of Jordan and Andre Anchondo. The Anchondo’s were young parents of three who died saving the life of one of their children.

According to reports, Jordan died directly shielding her baby, while Andre died trying to shield them both. The baby was injured but lived because his parents saved him.

Another person being hailed as a hero in the El Paso shooting is a man named David Johnson, who reportedly stepped in front of the gunman to save his wife and granddaughter. Both survived, though Johnson was killed.

Source: Facebook

A solider named Glendon Oakley who was at the mall at the time of the shooting has also been praised as a hero. 

In an interview with CNN, Oakley said after he heard gunfire, he ran towards a playpen where children were playing without their parents and grabbed as many children as he could to move them out of harm’s way.

“I was just focused on the kids, I wasn’t really worried about myself. So just put my head down and just ran as fast as I could,” Oakley told CNN. “I did that because that’s what I was trained to do and that’s what the military has taught me to do.”

Heroes From Dayton

Just 13 hours after the shooting in El Paso, a man wearing a mask and bulletproof vest opened fire outside a popular neighborhood in downtown Dayton, killing nine people, and wounding 27 others. 

Among the dead is the shooter’s sister. The shooter was killed by police 30 seconds after opening fire. Currently, there is no known motive for the shooting, though it has been reported that in high school the shooter had a “hit list” and a “rape list.”

In Dayton, officials are hailing the officers who killed the shooter as a hero. Dayton Mayor Nan Whaley said the officers saved “literally hundreds of lives.”

A nurse named Kayla Miller stopped to perform CPR while dodging gunfire is also being praised in Dayton.  According to reports, witnesses say she tried to resuscitate five people. 

“I’m grateful to be able to be alive and talk to my family and friends and tell them I’m OK, but my heart breaks for these families. It’s just not fair,” Miller told the TODAY Show.

What We Know About the El Paso Shooter

While little is known at least publicly about the motive of the Dayton shooter, more information has come out about the El Paso shooter, who is currently in police custody.

Investigators and police later found what they described as a “manifesto” they believe was written by the alleged shooter. The manifesto was posted on the message board 8Chan less than 20 minutes before the police received the first call about the attack.

That post has since been deleted, but an archived version of the post contained an attachment of what the author referred to as “the actual manifesto.” Another document with the first initial and last name of the shooter was also attached.

In the manifesto, the author wrote, “In general, I support the Christchurch shooter and his manifesto. This attack is a response to the Hispanic invasion of Texas. They are the instigators, not me. I am simply defending my country from cultural and ethnic replacement brought on by an invasion.”

The author referred to immigrants as “invaders” four separate times. They also say that they are against “race mixing” and said that the country should be divided up so each race has their own territory.

The author notably included a list of the type of guns they wanted to use for their attack and said they did not spend much time planning the attack or writing the manifesto.

The manifesto concludes with the author saying that their views predate President Donald Trump and his campaign and that Trump should not be blamed.

The author also added that the media will call them a white supremacist and blame their actions on Trump’s rhetoric, which they believes is an example of “fake news.”

Legal Actions

On Sunday, officials in Texas formally announced that they would be treating the alleged shooter as a domestic terrorist.

U.S. attorney for the Western District of Texas John Bash made the announcement in a press briefing.

Bash also said that his office was “seriously considering” bringing federal hate crime and federal firearm charges against the shooter, which carry a possible death penalty sentence.

The El Paso District Attorney Jaime Esparza separately said that his office has already charged the shooter with capital murder and will seek the death penalty in any state-level prosecution.

The federal domestic terrorism case, however, depends on whether or not it is confirmed that the alleged shooter wrote the manifesto.

To that point, El Paso Police Department Chief Greg Allen said it looks increasingly like the alleged shooter in custody wrote the manifesto, according to NPR. The New York Times also reported that a federal law enforcement official confirmed that it was written by the suspect.

Others have also pointed out at the fact that the suspect was from the suburbs of Dallas but drove nearly 10 hours to get to El Paso, a border town where more than 80% of residents are Hispanic or Latino, according to the most recent census.

The legal charges involving the El Paso shooting are also not limited to the U.S. On Sunday, Mexican Foreign Secretary Marcelo Ebrard announced that the Mexican government will be taking legal action against the U.S., but did not specify what that would be.

On Monday, Ebrard said that eight Mexican nationals had been killed in the shooting.

Editor’s Note: At Rogue Rocket, we make it a point to not include the names and pictures of mass murderers or suspected mass murderers who may have been seeking attention or infamy. Therefore, we will not be linking to other sources, as they may contain these details. Instead, we will be linking to donation pages for those impacted by the shootings.

Andre and Jordan Anchondo GoFundMe

El Paso Community Foundation Victims Fund

Dayton Oregon District Tragedy Fund

U.S.

Kathy Griffin, Ethan Klein, More Suspended From Twitter Over Elon Musk Impersonations

Published

on

Many have pretended to be Musk in an attempt to highlight the potential issues paid-for verifications could cause on the platform.


Musk Takes on Impersonations

Comedian Kathy Griffin and internet personality Ethan Klein are among the many Twitter users that have been permanently suspended for impersonating the platform’s new CEO, Elon Musk.

Impersonation has long been against Twitter’s rules, but on Sunday, the billionaire took the policy a step further by announcing that “any Twitter handles engaging in impersonation without clearly specifying ‘parody’ will be permanently suspended.”

“Previously, we issued a warning before suspension, but now that we are rolling out widespread verification, there will be no warning,” Musk explained. “This will be clearly identified as a condition for signing up to Twitter Blue.”

Musk also said that any user who changes their name will temporarily lose their verification check mark. 

The announcement came as many verified users began mocking Musk by changing their name and photo to match his, then tweeting jokes that were either absurd or out of character for the business mogul. Many did this to protest Musk’s plan to charge an $8 monthly subscription fee that would allow any Twitter user to become verified. 

Klein was one of many who changed his name to “Elon Musk” and made a photo of the CEO his profile image. The podcast host sent out several jokes, including one referencing the increased use of the N-word on the platform since Musk’s takeover, and another referencing Jeffrey Epstein.

“Even though Jeffrey Epstein committed horrible crimes, I do still miss him on nights like this for his warmth and camaraderie. Rest In Peace old Friend,” he wrote. 

His account was quickly banned, but Klein defended himself on TikTok, arguing that both his cover photo and bio labeled his account as “parody” and therefore should be acceptable under Musk’s guidelines. 

“What more do you want from me?” he asked. “Comedy is dead. And Elon Musk dug the grave.” 

Protests of Musk’s Twitter Control

For her part, Griffin likewise tweeted while masquerading as Musk, writing that after “spirited discussion with the females in my life, I’ve decided that voting blue for their choice is only right.”

Musk joked that she was actually “suspended for impersonating a comedian” and added that she can have her account back if she pays for the $8 subscription. Griffin, however, found another way around the ban.

The comedian logged into her late mother’s Twitter account and began using the hashtag #FreeKathy while calling out Musk. 

“Mad Men” actor Rich Sommer and podcaster Griffin Newman have also had their accounts suspended for tweeting as Musk. Other celebrities, including TV producer Shonda Rhimes, musician Sara Bareilles, and model Gigi Hadid have protested Musk’s Twitter reign by leaving the platform altogether.

“For a long time, but especially with its new leadership, it’s becoming more and more of a cesspool of hate & bigotry, and it’s not a place I want to be a part of,” Hadid wrote on Instagram over the weekend. 

See what others are saying: (NBC News) (Variety) (The Verge)

Continue Reading

U.S.

AOC Says Twitter Notifications “Conveniently” Disabled After Criticizing Musk

Published

on

“What’s good? Doesn’t seem very free speechy to me,” she tweeted at the new CEO.


AOC Vs. Elon Musk

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) said several of her Twitter features are “conveniently not working” after feuding with the platform’s new owner, billionaire Elon Musk.

Ocasio-Cortez has never been shy about her views on Musk. After he officially took charge of Twitter last week, the congresswoman began criticizing his new proposals for the social networking site, specifically his plan to charge an $8 subscription fee for verification. 

“Lmao at a billionaire earnestly trying to sell people on the idea that ‘free speech’ is actually a $8/mo subscription plan,” she wrote on Tuesday.

“Your feedback is appreciated, now pay $8,” Musk replied the following day.

Around an hour later, the business mogul sent another tweet appearing to call Ocasio-Cortez out for selling $58 sweatshirts. 

“Proud of this and always will be,” she shot back. “My workers are union, make a living wage, have full healthcare, and aren’t subject to racist treatment in their workplaces. Items are made in USA. Team AOC honors and respects working people. You should try it sometime instead of union-busting.”

In a follow-up tweet, she noted that proceeds go to community organizing programs, including one that tutors students who are falling behind because of COVID-19.

AOC’s Mentions Not Working

On Wednesday evening, just hours after her back-and-forth with Musk, Ocasio-Cortez told her followers that her “Twitter mentions/notifications conveniently aren’t working tonight.”

“I was informed via text that I seem to have gotten under a certain billionaire’s skin,” she added. “Just a reminder that money will never [buy] your way out of insecurity, folks.” 

The issue seemingly continued into Thursday morning when the Democrat tweeted a screenshot of her notifications page, which loaded no results. 

Why should people pay $8 just for their app to get bricked when they say something you don’t like?” she tweeted at Musk. “This is what my app has looked like ever since my tweet upset you yesterday. What’s good? Doesn’t seem very free speechy to me.”

Musk has repeatedly claimed that one of his primary motives to buy Twitter was to protect free speech. Once taking the reigns as CEO, though, he did say he would start a content moderation council and make decisions jointly with them.

See what others are saying: (The Hill) (Insider)

Continue Reading

U.S.

South Carolina County Votes Against Moving LGBTQ+ Friendly Books Away from Children’s Section

Published

on

Efforts to limit LGBTQ+ content in libraries first began over the summer.


Attempts to Restrict LGBTQ+ Displays

The county council in Greenville County, South Carolina this week voted against discussing a resolution that would move all books “promoting sexuality” to the adult section.

This resolution is the culmination of months of turmoil in Greenville County. In June, libraries in the county removed Pride displays at the direction of library officials. Then in September, the county’s Republican Party executive board passed a resolution to call on the County Council to restrict access to books with LGBTQ+ themes and characters. 

The resolution was proposed by Joe Dill, an outgoing council member, as well as a member of the county’s Republican Party executive board. It proposed the council “officially order that no books or content, including digital copies or online accessible materials, promoting sexuality be allowed in the Children’s Sections of our public libraries.” 

Resolution Rejected

However, the resolution required the council to suspend its regular rules in order to discuss it as it was not submitted to the council via committee. The final vote was 9 to 3 against the suspension of the rules and effectively killed the resolution. 

Those that voted against it viewed the resolution as an overreach.

“We just do not believe that’s our job to get involved in the library’s business,” Council member Ennis Fett said to a local news outlet. “We appoint a board. We can not set a precedent of micromanaging the library board, because if we do that, then, we will be micromanaging all boards and commissions that we appoint.” 

Although the council decided not to get involved, the library still has the final decision to make regarding these books. Their meeting to discuss the matter is scheduled for December 5. 

See what others are saying: (Greenville News) (The Post and Courier) (7 News)

Continue Reading