Connect with us

U.S.

Teacher Battling Cancer Forced by CA Law to Pay for the Cost of a Substitute While on Sick Leave

Published

on

  • A second-grade teacher at an Elementary school in San Fransisco is battling breast cancer and is on sick leave for the remainder of the year.
  • Parents were outraged when they learned that the daily cost of a substitute teacher was coming from her paycheck.
  • California laws allow for the cost of a substitute to be deducted from a teachers paycheck when the teacher takes extended sick leave.

California Teachers & Sick Leave

A second-grade teacher in San Francisco, who is battling cancer and on sick leave for the remainder of the school year, has part of her paycheck deducted to cover the cost of the substitute teacher for her class.

The school, Glen Park Elementary, allows for teachers to take ten paid sick days a year. If more days are needed after the initial ten, teachers can take a sick leave of up to 100 days, but that is when the cost of a substitute becomes their responsibility. While the amount of paid sick days vary among school districts, incurring the cost of a substitute is a statewide law.

Glen Park Elementary. Source: Google Maps

This law has been in effect since 1976 but is not well known and caused widespread outrage when the news first broke. According to the San Francisco Chronical, the cost of a substitute teacher in San Francisco can be anywhere from $174.66 to $240.26 a day.

Parents of the second-grade class started a GoFundMe to help their children’s teacher. According to local reports, the goal of the fundraiser was $10,000 to offset the cost of her medical expenses, loss of income, and the substitute teacher’s pay. The GoFundMe has since been closed and raised over $13,000.

Teachers Battle for Rights

In California, teachers are not covered by Social Security, meaning they do not pay into specific programs like state disability insurance. This, in turn, makes it legal for the state to require a deduction for the cost of a substitute, even if one is not hired to cover the absent teacher’s class.

Originally, all state employees were left out of the 1935 Social Security Act. When the act was amended in the 1950s, many states chose to extend Social Security coverage to state workers, while the rest implemented state pension plans. The pension plan was an attractive alternative years ago when states believed they could provide better care, but that is no longer the case. A 2017 study found that for a teacher’s pension to be worth more than their own contribution, they have to teach for an average of 25 years.  

“That means teachers…must wait at least two-and-a-half decades before their retirement benefit is worth more than what they’ve put in themselves,” the study showed.  

Source: Thomas B. Fordham Institute

New teachers have expressed how hard it is to become eligible for their school districts pension plans. TeacherPensions.org explains that states tend to set a required minimum of five to ten years of service before they qualify for retirement benefits. This leaves over 50 percent of teachers without a pension and adds to the years they must work for a secure future.  

There are 15 states, including California, where public employees are still not covered by Social Security. The former Governor of California, Jerry Brown, has previously stated his support for school districts to participate in the State Disability Insurance program.

Responses

The president of the California Teachers Association, Eric Heins, says that for years this has been the norm for teachers and they just accept it.

“What it really is, is a reflection of how financially strapped the system has been for so long,” Heins told the Washington Post.

However, some government officials say they did not even know of the law until the story broke.

“I just learned of this issue, and it seems kind of outrageous,” State Senator Connie Leyva told NBC LA. “Candidly, I think the times have changed, and now it’s our job to change with the times.”

In addition to the GoFundMe for the teacher in San Francisco, her students have planned to host bake sales to help with future costs.  

See what others are saying: (Business Insider) (Yahoo News) (BBC)

U.S.

How Safe Injections Sites in the U.S. Are Fighting Back Against The Opioid Crisis & Do They Work?

Published

on


America has been hit with a historical opioid crisis. In 2018, more than 31,000 people died from opioid overdoses, which is more than any previous year recorded in American history. Healthcare professionals and public health experts are offering alternatives to the status quo treatments, which leads us to today’s topic: supervised injection facilities (SIF). 

Also known as overdose prevention sites and medically supervised injection centers, SIF’s have been proposed as a solution to combat America’s opioid problem. In these centers, no drugs are supplied to the users—they bring their own and are given clean syringes to prevent bloodborne diseases. Advocates or these sites are saying that they would stop countless fatal overdoses because there would be medical staff on site. Countries like Switzerland, Canada, and Australia have implemented versions of these facilities and so far there has not been any reported fatal overdoses at a SIF in the world. 

While cities like Seattle, San Francisco, New York City, and Philadelphia have all proposed plans to make sites, they have been met with heavy opposition. The federal government opposed these sites because they claim it breaks federal laws and some residents in these cities are against them due to concerns over attracting more crime. In this video, we’ll be focusing on Philadelphia, as it might become the first U.S. city to legally open a supervised injection facility, along with the court case between the non-profit who is trying to establish the SIF and the federal government.

Continue Reading

U.S.

Elon Musk Defends Calling Rescue Diver “Pedo Guy” in Lawsuit

Published

on

  • In court documents, Elon Musk defended a tweet where he called a diver who helped rescue the Thai soccer team from a cave a “pedo guy” because it “was a common insult used in South Africa.” 
  • The diver sued Musk for defamation last year after Musk sent an email to BuzzFeed where he referred to the diver as “child rapist” who had taken a “child bride who was about 12 years old.” 
  • The court documents from the suit, which were made public Monday, also revealed that Musk paid a private investigator more than $50,000 to look into the diver.
  • Musk also said he gave the statement to BuzzFeed based on information provided by the investigator, and because he was concerned the diver could be the next Jeffrey Epstein. 

Court Filings Made Public

Telsa CEO Elon Musk defended calling a rescue diver “pedo guy,” court documents revealed Monday.

Musk originally made the comment in July 2018, after Vernon Unsworth, a British diver who helped rescue the Thai soccer team trapped in a cave last year, gave an interview to CNN where he had some choice things to say about Musk.

Notably, Unsworth said the submarine Musk had designed to rescue the soccer team would not work and that it was just a PR stunt.

Musk responded by calling Unsworth a “pedo guy” in a now-deleted tweet.

Source: Elon Musk

He also sent an email to BuzzFeed reporter Ryan Mac, in which he accused Unsworth of being a “child rapist” who had taken a “child bride who was about 12 years old at the time.”

Source: BuzzFeed

Musk said he thought the email was off the record, but BuzzFeed said they never agreed to that. In September 2018, Unsworth filed a defamation lawsuit against Musk in the Central District of California.

Court filings from the defamation suit against Musk were made public on Monday.

Musk Defends “Pedo Guy” Tweet

In those documents, Musk claimed that referring to Unsworth as “pedo guy” was not a direct accusation of pedophilia.

“‘Pedo guy’ was a common insult used in South Africa when I was growing up,” Musk wrote. “It is synonymous with ‘creepy old man’ and is used to insult a person’s appearance and demeanor, not accuse a person of acts of pedophilia.”

“I did not intend to accuse Mr. Unsworth of engaging in acts of pedophilia,” he continued. “In response to his insults in the CNN interview, I meant to insult him back by expressing my opinion that he seemed like a creepy old man.”

The fact that Musk is arguing he was expressing his opinion is important in this context because under the First Amendment, opinions are usually protected speech and not considered defamatory.

The documents also included Musk’s deposition, where he talks more in-depth about the “pedo guy” tweet.

In the deposition, Musk said he sent BuzzFeed the email because he was worried it could turn into a Jeffrey Epstein situation, referring to the wealthy financier who was accused of sexually assaulting dozens of young women, including many underage girls. 

“What if we have another Jeffrey Epstein on our hands?” he said. “And what if he uses whatever celebrity he gains from this cave rescue to shield his bad deeds? This would be terrible.”

Musk’s Epstein argument might become problematic. First of all, he made the statements to BuzzFeed before the new allegations surfaced, which some have argued proves he just is using current news to frame Unsworth in a certain way, and that he did not actually consider Epstein at all.

That argument is also furthered by the fact that it has been reported that Musk had attended several events with Epstein, all of which were after Epstein pleaded guilty to soliciting prostitution from an underage girl in 2008.

Musk even said he visited Epstein’s house “several years ago.” Epstein also told The New York Times he had advised Musk while Tesla was trying to go public in 2018, though Musk denies those claims.

Private Investigator

Notably, Musk also said in the filings that he paid a private investigator more than $50,000 to investigate Unsworth after receiving an unsolicited email from the PI in August 2018.

In the documents, Musk says that the investigator: “reported that Mr. Unsworth met and began a relationship with his alleged Thai wife when she around twelve years old.”

He also added that the investigator “reported that Mr. Unsworth associated with Europeans who engage in improper sexual conduct in Thailand,” and that he “learned that Mr. Unsworth frequented Pattaya Beach which is well known for prostitution and sex tourism, and that Mr. Unsworth was unpopular at the rescue site because other rescue workers thought that he was ‘creepy.’”

Musk goes on to say this was the basis for the comments he made in his email to BuzzFeed.

“I did not authorize Mr. Mac or BuzzFeed to publish the contents of the email nor did I intend or expect that they would,” he said. “Especially without first independently verifying and confirming its information.”

He later added that he gave the information to Mac “so that BuzzFeed could conduct its own investigation into Mr. Unsworth and corroborate the information.”

Musk’s lawyers even admitted in the court filings that the private investigator’s findings “lacked solid evidence of Mr. Unsworth’s behavior.” 

Following the release of the court documents, Unsworth’s lawyer gave a statement to BuzzFeed condemning the Musk’s defense.

“The motion filed by Elon Musk today is a disgusting and transparent effort to continue falsely smearing Vernon Unsworth without any credible or verified supporting evidence,” the lawyer said.

“Mr. Unsworth’s opposition to Musk’s motion will reveal the whole truth of Musk’s actions and the falsity of his public statements and his motion with respect to Mr. Unsworth will be exposed.”

See what others are saying: (BuzzFeed News) (The Washington Post) (Business Insider)

Continue Reading

U.S.

Controversy, Racism, and Genius Kids?! How One Sperm Bank Changed Everything…

Published

on


The Repository for Germinal Choice is the most controversial sperm bank in U.S. history. While it was operational some people believed this bank was racist and they even compared the companies goals to Nazi eugenic practices. But even though this sperm bank was highly controversial, it also completely changed the sperm bank industry.

So check out our video for the full story on how this controversial sperm bank would go on to shape an entire industry.

Continue Reading