- Georgia’s governor signed a bill on Tuesday that bans abortions after a fetal heartbeat can be detected, which can happen around six weeks into a pregnancy.
- Members of the film industry, including Alyssa Milano, Mark Duplass, David Simon, Nina Jacobson, and others, are promising to pull productions out of the state unless the law is overturned.
- Georgia’s film economy reportedly generates billions of dollars and is home to shows like Stranger Things, The Walking Dead, and Marvel hits like Black Panther.
Hollywood Vows to Step Away From Georgia
Actors, directors, and other film industry leaders are refusing to film in Georgia after the state’s governor signed a controversial “fetal heartbeat” abortion bill.
On Tuesday, Gov. Brian Kemp passed legislation banning abortions after a heartbeat can be detected in a fetus or embryo. This can happen around six weeks into a pregnancy.
Many believe that this legislation violates Roe Vs. Wade and a woman’s right to have autonomy over her body, as most do not know they are even pregnant at six weeks. As a result, many prominent figures in the film and television industry have decided to take a stand against this move by refusing to film in the state.
Back in March, when the bill started making headlines, actor Alyssa Milano wrote a letter addressing Gov. Kemp and the bill, known as H.B. 481.
“We cannot in good conscience continue to recommend our industry remain in Georgia if H.B. 481 becomes law,” she wrote. “This dangerous and deeply-flawed bill mimics many others which have already been deemed unconstitutional.”https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js
The letter was then signed by over 50 other actors, including big names like Don Cheadle, Mia Farrow, Debra Messing, Gabrielle Union, Ben Stiller, Mark Hamill, and Mandy Moore.
After the bill was signed on Tuesday, Milano gave a statement to BuzzFeed News saying she planned to act on her promise. While the actress is currently in Georgia filming the second season of the Netflix series Insatiable, she does not intend to return.
“I have to be there for another month but you can be sure I will fight tooth and nail to move Insatiable to a state that will protect our rights,” Milano said. “And if it doesn’t move to another state, I will not be able to return to the show if we are blessed with a third season. This is my leverage. I will use it for the betterment of society and our great country.”
Milano is not the only one using her status in Hollywood to move production out of the state. Mark Duplass, an actor, writer, and one of the heads of Duplass Brothers Productions, encouraged others to join him in taking business out of Georgia.
Other production executives have backed this idea. The C.E.O. of Killer Films, the company behind Oscar contenders like Still Alice and Carol, said the production company will not return to Georgia until “this ridiculous law is overturned.”
David Simon, the creator of The Wire and The Duece said his company, Blown Deadline Productions, will also stay out of the state. One of the industry’s biggest producers, Nina Jacobson, who has had her hand in The Hunger Games trilogy, American Crime Story, Crazy Rich Asians, and other massive money makers, echoed his statement.
Georgia’s Thriving Film Industry
Dubbed “the Hollywood of the South” by some, Georgia’s film industry is massive and thriving. According to Film LA, in 2016, 17 out of the top 100 highest domestic grossing movies were filmed there. This number is higher than both California and New York. According to Gov. Kemp, the industry creates over $60 billion in economic activity.
Incredibly popular television programs are filmed in the state, including Stranger Things and The Walking Dead. Some of Marvel’s box-office-smashes, including Avengers: Infinity War and Black Panther were also shot there.
According to the Los Angeles Times, the state is home to anywhere between 30-40 productions at a time. Companies have taken their projects there as a result of both the warm weather and the 30 percent tax credit the state offers to film, television, and other productions who film there.
The Fetal Heartbeat Bill
Currently, Georgia allows abortion up to 20 weeks into a pregnancy. This time will cut dramatically by January 2020 unless the bill sees blocks in court, which it likely will.
The American Civil Liberties Union has already promised to challenge the bill, tweeting, “see you in court,” shortly after the news broke.
H.B. 481 mandates that Georgia consider “unborn children as natural persons.” It also allows for women who perform their own abortions to be liable for murder. The same applies to a woman who miscarries if prosecutors can prove her actions, such as drug or alcohol use, caused it.
Exceptions will be made in cases of rape, incest, or of the mother’s life is in jeopardy.
See what others are saying: (The Hollywood Reporter) (Los Angeles Times) (The Hill)
How Safe Injections Sites in the U.S. Are Fighting Back Against The Opioid Crisis & Do They Work?
America has been hit with a historical opioid crisis. In 2018, more than 31,000 people died from opioid overdoses, which is more than any previous year recorded in American history. Healthcare professionals and public health experts are offering alternatives to the status quo treatments, which leads us to today’s topic: supervised injection facilities (SIF).
Also known as overdose prevention sites and medically supervised injection centers, SIF’s have been proposed as a solution to combat America’s opioid problem. In these centers, no drugs are supplied to the users—they bring their own and are given clean syringes to prevent bloodborne diseases. Advocates or these sites are saying that they would stop countless fatal overdoses because there would be medical staff on site. Countries like Switzerland, Canada, and Australia have implemented versions of these facilities and so far there has not been any reported fatal overdoses at a SIF in the world.
While cities like Seattle, San Francisco, New York City, and Philadelphia have all proposed plans to make sites, they have been met with heavy opposition. The federal government opposed these sites because they claim it breaks federal laws and some residents in these cities are against them due to concerns over attracting more crime. In this video, we’ll be focusing on Philadelphia, as it might become the first U.S. city to legally open a supervised injection facility, along with the court case between the non-profit who is trying to establish the SIF and the federal government.
Elon Musk Defends Calling Rescue Diver “Pedo Guy” in Lawsuit
- In court documents, Elon Musk defended a tweet where he called a diver who helped rescue the Thai soccer team from a cave a “pedo guy” because it “was a common insult used in South Africa.”
- The diver sued Musk for defamation last year after Musk sent an email to BuzzFeed where he referred to the diver as “child rapist” who had taken a “child bride who was about 12 years old.”
- The court documents from the suit, which were made public Monday, also revealed that Musk paid a private investigator more than $50,000 to look into the diver.
- Musk also said he gave the statement to BuzzFeed based on information provided by the investigator, and because he was concerned the diver could be the next Jeffrey Epstein.
Court Filings Made Public
Telsa CEO Elon Musk defended calling a rescue diver “pedo guy,” court documents revealed Monday.
Musk originally made the comment in July 2018, after Vernon Unsworth, a British diver who helped rescue the Thai soccer team trapped in a cave last year, gave an interview to CNN where he had some choice things to say about Musk.
Notably, Unsworth said the submarine Musk had designed to rescue the soccer team would not work and that it was just a PR stunt.
Musk responded by calling Unsworth a “pedo guy” in a now-deleted tweet.
He also sent an email to BuzzFeed reporter Ryan Mac, in which he accused Unsworth of being a “child rapist” who had taken a “child bride who was about 12 years old at the time.”
Musk said he thought the email was off the record, but BuzzFeed said they never agreed to that. In September 2018, Unsworth filed a defamation lawsuit against Musk in the Central District of California.
Court filings from the defamation suit against Musk were made public on Monday.
Musk Defends “Pedo Guy” Tweet
In those documents, Musk claimed that referring to Unsworth as “pedo guy” was not a direct accusation of pedophilia.
“‘Pedo guy’ was a common insult used in South Africa when I was growing up,” Musk wrote. “It is synonymous with ‘creepy old man’ and is used to insult a person’s appearance and demeanor, not accuse a person of acts of pedophilia.”
“I did not intend to accuse Mr. Unsworth of engaging in acts of pedophilia,” he continued. “In response to his insults in the CNN interview, I meant to insult him back by expressing my opinion that he seemed like a creepy old man.”
The fact that Musk is arguing he was expressing his opinion is important in this context because under the First Amendment, opinions are usually protected speech and not considered defamatory.
The documents also included Musk’s deposition, where he talks more in-depth about the “pedo guy” tweet.
In the deposition, Musk said he sent BuzzFeed the email because he was worried it could turn into a Jeffrey Epstein situation, referring to the wealthy financier who was accused of sexually assaulting dozens of young women, including many underage girls.
“What if we have another Jeffrey Epstein on our hands?” he said. “And what if he uses whatever celebrity he gains from this cave rescue to shield his bad deeds? This would be terrible.”
Musk’s Epstein argument might become problematic. First of all, he made the statements to BuzzFeed before the new allegations surfaced, which some have argued proves he just is using current news to frame Unsworth in a certain way, and that he did not actually consider Epstein at all.
That argument is also furthered by the fact that it has been reported that Musk had attended several events with Epstein, all of which were after Epstein pleaded guilty to soliciting prostitution from an underage girl in 2008.
Notably, Musk also said in the filings that he paid a private investigator more than $50,000 to investigate Unsworth after receiving an unsolicited email from the PI in August 2018.
In the documents, Musk says that the investigator: “reported that Mr. Unsworth met and began a relationship with his alleged Thai wife when she around twelve years old.”
He also added that the investigator “reported that Mr. Unsworth associated with Europeans who engage in improper sexual conduct in Thailand,” and that he “learned that Mr. Unsworth frequented Pattaya Beach which is well known for prostitution and sex tourism, and that Mr. Unsworth was unpopular at the rescue site because other rescue workers thought that he was ‘creepy.’”
Musk goes on to say this was the basis for the comments he made in his email to BuzzFeed.
“I did not authorize Mr. Mac or BuzzFeed to publish the contents of the email nor did I intend or expect that they would,” he said. “Especially without first independently verifying and confirming its information.”
He later added that he gave the information to Mac “so that BuzzFeed could conduct its own investigation into Mr. Unsworth and corroborate the information.”
Musk’s lawyers even admitted in the court filings that the private investigator’s findings “lacked solid evidence of Mr. Unsworth’s behavior.”
Following the release of the court documents, Unsworth’s lawyer gave a statement to BuzzFeed condemning the Musk’s defense.
“The motion filed by Elon Musk today is a disgusting and transparent effort to continue falsely smearing Vernon Unsworth without any credible or verified supporting evidence,” the lawyer said.
“Mr. Unsworth’s opposition to Musk’s motion will reveal the whole truth of Musk’s actions and the falsity of his public statements and his motion with respect to Mr. Unsworth will be exposed.”
See what others are saying: (BuzzFeed News) (The Washington Post) (Business Insider)
Controversy, Racism, and Genius Kids?! How One Sperm Bank Changed Everything…
The Repository for Germinal Choice is the most controversial sperm bank in U.S. history. While it was operational some people believed this bank was racist and they even compared the companies goals to Nazi eugenic practices. But even though this sperm bank was highly controversial, it also completely changed the sperm bank industry.
So check out our video for the full story on how this controversial sperm bank would go on to shape an entire industry.