Connect with us

U.S.

Illinois High School Students Stage Walkout Over Blackface Posts

Published

on

  • Around 1,000 students walked out of their Illinois high school on Tuesday after four male students wore blackface and made derogatory comments in videos posted to Snapchat.
  • School officials said they cannot release details about the students involved or their punishment, but the community feels that not enough is being done.
  • The school supported the walkout and has promised to move forward with diversity and cultural competency training for all staff members and students.

Blackface Posts

Hundreds of students at an Illinois high school participated in a walkout on Tuesday after fellow students wore blackface and made derogatory comments in social media posts.  

The four male students are Homewood-Flossmoor High School posted videos of themselves wearing blackface while in a McDonald’s drive-thru. According to ABC 7, in the posts, the teens also made disparaging comments about black women.

The posts were uploaded to Snapchat and show at least one student wearing the high school’s sweatshirt. Screenshots of the videos were widely shared among the student body over the weekend, sparking a ton of outrage.

School’s Response

School officials said that they became aware of the posts early Sunday morning and immediately met with the families of the students involved. However, because of confidentiality laws, the school said it could not release the names of the students or the actions that it has taken against them.

“This type of behavior is contrary to our expectations, is being addressed quickly and appropriately and will not be tolerated,” the school added in a letter to parents sent Monday.

Walkout

Still, many students believed that the school’s response was underwhelming and felt that more needed to be done to make it clear that these type of acts are not be tolerated on campus.

In fact, many were outraged to see the students in class Monday morning. One student told CBS News, “They should have been suspended or expelled or something should have happened to let these guys know that that is not okay.”

“Our school is not doing a good job of protecting our rights. They are protecting the guys who did this.”   

Another student said that the boys involved are escorted to each class by security and leave five minutes ahead of everyone else.

Black students and parents told the Chicago Tribune that they felt that in the past, white students have been given a “slap on the wrist” for behaviors that earned black students more severe punishments. Nearly 69 percent of Homewood-Flossmoor’s student body is black, but around 80 percent of its teachers are white, according to state data.

In response to the videos, students at the school decided to organize a walkout in protest.

Around 1000 of students walked out of class Tuesday afternoon, spreading messages of diversity, inclusion, and equality.

School Supports Walkout

The protest was even backed by school officials. “We have been made aware that some of our students may participate in a walkout sometime today to express their frustration with the social media posts and actions of a few students this past weekend,” the school said in another letter to parents sent Tuesday.

“We support their right to express themselves, and we will work to ensure that all students are safe and respected.”

Officials at Homewood-Flossmoor also addressed students via their school’s TV news channel the morning of the walkout and discussed the importance of sharing their voice.

School leadership later sent a special message to students over video after the walkout, with Superintendent Von Mansfield and Principal Jerry Lee Anderson saying, “We would like to applaud our students and staff members who participated. Our students were amazing and conducted themselves in a very peaceful and orderly manner.”

What’s Next?

CBS News reported that at least one of the teens involved in the offensive posts has apologized, saying that he was unaware of what blackface was. However, many students have rejected this claim and said that if true, the school must do a better job of teaching black history.

The administration sent a follow-up letter after the student’s demonstration where they touched on long-term and short-term plans to address the issue.

On Wednesday, the superintendent and the principal will join students in their English classes for an “interactive discussion.” Then in the future, school leaders will move forward with plans that start with “diversity and cultural competency training for all staff members and students.”

“Please know that we understand your frustration that the school district cannot legally share specific information related to student discipline, but do know that the type of behavior these students displayed is not condoned by the school and that we are doing everything possible to ensure that these students understand the ramifications of their actions and that appropriate consequences are received,”the school said in its latest statement.

See what others are saying: (Chicago Tribune) (The Washington Post) (CBS News)  



U.S.

How Safe Injections Sites in the U.S. Are Fighting Back Against The Opioid Crisis & Do They Work?

Published

on


America has been hit with a historical opioid crisis. In 2018, more than 31,000 people died from opioid overdoses, which is more than any previous year recorded in American history. Healthcare professionals and public health experts are offering alternatives to the status quo treatments, which leads us to today’s topic: supervised injection facilities (SIF). 

Also known as overdose prevention sites and medically supervised injection centers, SIF’s have been proposed as a solution to combat America’s opioid problem. In these centers, no drugs are supplied to the users—they bring their own and are given clean syringes to prevent bloodborne diseases. Advocates or these sites are saying that they would stop countless fatal overdoses because there would be medical staff on site. Countries like Switzerland, Canada, and Australia have implemented versions of these facilities and so far there has not been any reported fatal overdoses at a SIF in the world. 

While cities like Seattle, San Francisco, New York City, and Philadelphia have all proposed plans to make sites, they have been met with heavy opposition. The federal government opposed these sites because they claim it breaks federal laws and some residents in these cities are against them due to concerns over attracting more crime. In this video, we’ll be focusing on Philadelphia, as it might become the first U.S. city to legally open a supervised injection facility, along with the court case between the non-profit who is trying to establish the SIF and the federal government.

Continue Reading

U.S.

Elon Musk Defends Calling Rescue Diver “Pedo Guy” in Lawsuit

Published

on

  • In court documents, Elon Musk defended a tweet where he called a diver who helped rescue the Thai soccer team from a cave a “pedo guy” because it “was a common insult used in South Africa.” 
  • The diver sued Musk for defamation last year after Musk sent an email to BuzzFeed where he referred to the diver as “child rapist” who had taken a “child bride who was about 12 years old.” 
  • The court documents from the suit, which were made public Monday, also revealed that Musk paid a private investigator more than $50,000 to look into the diver.
  • Musk also said he gave the statement to BuzzFeed based on information provided by the investigator, and because he was concerned the diver could be the next Jeffrey Epstein. 

Court Filings Made Public

Telsa CEO Elon Musk defended calling a rescue diver “pedo guy,” court documents revealed Monday.

Musk originally made the comment in July 2018, after Vernon Unsworth, a British diver who helped rescue the Thai soccer team trapped in a cave last year, gave an interview to CNN where he had some choice things to say about Musk.

Notably, Unsworth said the submarine Musk had designed to rescue the soccer team would not work and that it was just a PR stunt.

Musk responded by calling Unsworth a “pedo guy” in a now-deleted tweet.

Source: Elon Musk

He also sent an email to BuzzFeed reporter Ryan Mac, in which he accused Unsworth of being a “child rapist” who had taken a “child bride who was about 12 years old at the time.”

Source: BuzzFeed

Musk said he thought the email was off the record, but BuzzFeed said they never agreed to that. In September 2018, Unsworth filed a defamation lawsuit against Musk in the Central District of California.

Court filings from the defamation suit against Musk were made public on Monday.

Musk Defends “Pedo Guy” Tweet

In those documents, Musk claimed that referring to Unsworth as “pedo guy” was not a direct accusation of pedophilia.

“‘Pedo guy’ was a common insult used in South Africa when I was growing up,” Musk wrote. “It is synonymous with ‘creepy old man’ and is used to insult a person’s appearance and demeanor, not accuse a person of acts of pedophilia.”

“I did not intend to accuse Mr. Unsworth of engaging in acts of pedophilia,” he continued. “In response to his insults in the CNN interview, I meant to insult him back by expressing my opinion that he seemed like a creepy old man.”

The fact that Musk is arguing he was expressing his opinion is important in this context because under the First Amendment, opinions are usually protected speech and not considered defamatory.

The documents also included Musk’s deposition, where he talks more in-depth about the “pedo guy” tweet.

In the deposition, Musk said he sent BuzzFeed the email because he was worried it could turn into a Jeffrey Epstein situation, referring to the wealthy financier who was accused of sexually assaulting dozens of young women, including many underage girls. 

“What if we have another Jeffrey Epstein on our hands?” he said. “And what if he uses whatever celebrity he gains from this cave rescue to shield his bad deeds? This would be terrible.”

Musk’s Epstein argument might become problematic. First of all, he made the statements to BuzzFeed before the new allegations surfaced, which some have argued proves he just is using current news to frame Unsworth in a certain way, and that he did not actually consider Epstein at all.

That argument is also furthered by the fact that it has been reported that Musk had attended several events with Epstein, all of which were after Epstein pleaded guilty to soliciting prostitution from an underage girl in 2008.

Musk even said he visited Epstein’s house “several years ago.” Epstein also told The New York Times he had advised Musk while Tesla was trying to go public in 2018, though Musk denies those claims.

Private Investigator

Notably, Musk also said in the filings that he paid a private investigator more than $50,000 to investigate Unsworth after receiving an unsolicited email from the PI in August 2018.

In the documents, Musk says that the investigator: “reported that Mr. Unsworth met and began a relationship with his alleged Thai wife when she around twelve years old.”

He also added that the investigator “reported that Mr. Unsworth associated with Europeans who engage in improper sexual conduct in Thailand,” and that he “learned that Mr. Unsworth frequented Pattaya Beach which is well known for prostitution and sex tourism, and that Mr. Unsworth was unpopular at the rescue site because other rescue workers thought that he was ‘creepy.’”

Musk goes on to say this was the basis for the comments he made in his email to BuzzFeed.

“I did not authorize Mr. Mac or BuzzFeed to publish the contents of the email nor did I intend or expect that they would,” he said. “Especially without first independently verifying and confirming its information.”

He later added that he gave the information to Mac “so that BuzzFeed could conduct its own investigation into Mr. Unsworth and corroborate the information.”

Musk’s lawyers even admitted in the court filings that the private investigator’s findings “lacked solid evidence of Mr. Unsworth’s behavior.” 

Following the release of the court documents, Unsworth’s lawyer gave a statement to BuzzFeed condemning the Musk’s defense.

“The motion filed by Elon Musk today is a disgusting and transparent effort to continue falsely smearing Vernon Unsworth without any credible or verified supporting evidence,” the lawyer said.

“Mr. Unsworth’s opposition to Musk’s motion will reveal the whole truth of Musk’s actions and the falsity of his public statements and his motion with respect to Mr. Unsworth will be exposed.”

See what others are saying: (BuzzFeed News) (The Washington Post) (Business Insider)

Continue Reading

U.S.

Controversy, Racism, and Genius Kids?! How One Sperm Bank Changed Everything…

Published

on


The Repository for Germinal Choice is the most controversial sperm bank in U.S. history. While it was operational some people believed this bank was racist and they even compared the companies goals to Nazi eugenic practices. But even though this sperm bank was highly controversial, it also completely changed the sperm bank industry.

So check out our video for the full story on how this controversial sperm bank would go on to shape an entire industry.

Continue Reading