- President Donald Trump warned leaders in the NRA to stop infighting and accused New York Government Officials of illegally investigating the group.
- This follows several reports on tensions between leaders in the organization, which lead to the resignation of NRA President Oliver North.
- It also follows an investigation opened by the New York Attorney General into the NRA’s finances.
President Trump Warns Against NRA Infighting
President Donald Trump called an investigation into the NRA “illegal” on Monday and urged the organization to stop infighting in a series of tweets.
Trump said that the NRA is “under siege” by New York Governor Andrew Cuomo and New York State Attorney General Letitia James. He accused them of “illegally using the State’s legal apparatus to take down and destroy this very important organization.”
He later added that the NRA should “get its act together quickly” and “leave and fight from the outside of this very difficult to deal with (unfair) State!”
Tensions Revealed Among NRA Leaders
Trump’s tweets follow a series of controversies engulfing the NRA as the organization meets for its annual meeting.
On Friday, infighting between leaders in the group was revealed by reports in the Wall Street Journal and New York Times. According to the articles, the NRA’s President, Oliver North, wanted the company’s CEO and Executive Vice President, Wayne LaPierre to resign.
LaPierre then wrote a letter to the NRA Board accusing North of extortion. He said that North spoke on the phone with one of his senior staff members and brought up a letter drafted by one of the NRA’s vendors, Ackerman McQueen.
The letter allegedly contained information that would be “bad” for LaPierre, who claimed North wanted to give him two options.
“Unless I resigned as the Executive Vice President of the Association, Ackerman would transmit this allegedly damaging letter to the entire NRA Board,” LaPierre wrote.
As for what the damaging information in the letter is, he did not specify. North has recently alleged that LaPierre participated in financial misconduct. One instance, in particular, reports cite LaPierre charging $200,000 in wardrobe transactions to a vendor. However, LaPierre said he intended to stand strong in his role.
This letter, as well as North’s request for LaPierre’s resignation, come after a lawsuit that was recently filed by the NRA against Ackerman McQueen. The suit alleges that the Ackerman McQueen has refused to hand over business records and financial statements that the NRA is contractually entitled to. North, who receives a salary from Ackerman McQueen for an NRA TV series, has sided with Ackerman McQueen over the NRA in this battle.
New York Attorney General Launches Investigation
Right as this infighting was revealed, New York Attorney General Letitia James announced that she is opening an investigation into the NRA on Saturday. On Saturday, her spokesperson said that subpoenas have already been issued. This investigation is what the President referred to in his string of tweets directed at New York government officials.
According to reports, James will be looking into the NRA’s finances, including its charitable foundation, to assess their status as a non-profit tax-exempt organization. She has already reached out to the NRA asking for them to preserve financial documents.
An outside lawyer for the NRA gave a statement saying that they were ready to work with James as she investigates.
“The N.R.A. will fully cooperate with any inquiry into its finances,” the statement read. “The N.R.A. is prepared for this, and has full confidence in its accounting practices and commitment to good governance.”
Also on Saturday, North announced that he would not be seeking a second term as president of the NRA. He had a board member read a letter on his behalf at the annual meeting, where he cited the financial and legal troubles the organization is facing.
In the letter, he warned that “there is a clear crisis” within the NRA.
See what others are saying: (Wall Street Journal) (New York Times) (Associated Press)
How Safe Injections Sites in the U.S. Are Fighting Back Against The Opioid Crisis & Do They Work?
America has been hit with a historical opioid crisis. In 2018, more than 31,000 people died from opioid overdoses, which is more than any previous year recorded in American history. Healthcare professionals and public health experts are offering alternatives to the status quo treatments, which leads us to today’s topic: supervised injection facilities (SIF).
Also known as overdose prevention sites and medically supervised injection centers, SIF’s have been proposed as a solution to combat America’s opioid problem. In these centers, no drugs are supplied to the users—they bring their own and are given clean syringes to prevent bloodborne diseases. Advocates or these sites are saying that they would stop countless fatal overdoses because there would be medical staff on site. Countries like Switzerland, Canada, and Australia have implemented versions of these facilities and so far there has not been any reported fatal overdoses at a SIF in the world.
While cities like Seattle, San Francisco, New York City, and Philadelphia have all proposed plans to make sites, they have been met with heavy opposition. The federal government opposed these sites because they claim it breaks federal laws and some residents in these cities are against them due to concerns over attracting more crime. In this video, we’ll be focusing on Philadelphia, as it might become the first U.S. city to legally open a supervised injection facility, along with the court case between the non-profit who is trying to establish the SIF and the federal government.
Elon Musk Defends Calling Rescue Diver “Pedo Guy” in Lawsuit
- In court documents, Elon Musk defended a tweet where he called a diver who helped rescue the Thai soccer team from a cave a “pedo guy” because it “was a common insult used in South Africa.”
- The diver sued Musk for defamation last year after Musk sent an email to BuzzFeed where he referred to the diver as “child rapist” who had taken a “child bride who was about 12 years old.”
- The court documents from the suit, which were made public Monday, also revealed that Musk paid a private investigator more than $50,000 to look into the diver.
- Musk also said he gave the statement to BuzzFeed based on information provided by the investigator, and because he was concerned the diver could be the next Jeffrey Epstein.
Court Filings Made Public
Telsa CEO Elon Musk defended calling a rescue diver “pedo guy,” court documents revealed Monday.
Musk originally made the comment in July 2018, after Vernon Unsworth, a British diver who helped rescue the Thai soccer team trapped in a cave last year, gave an interview to CNN where he had some choice things to say about Musk.
Notably, Unsworth said the submarine Musk had designed to rescue the soccer team would not work and that it was just a PR stunt.
Musk responded by calling Unsworth a “pedo guy” in a now-deleted tweet.
He also sent an email to BuzzFeed reporter Ryan Mac, in which he accused Unsworth of being a “child rapist” who had taken a “child bride who was about 12 years old at the time.”
Musk said he thought the email was off the record, but BuzzFeed said they never agreed to that. In September 2018, Unsworth filed a defamation lawsuit against Musk in the Central District of California.
Court filings from the defamation suit against Musk were made public on Monday.
Musk Defends “Pedo Guy” Tweet
In those documents, Musk claimed that referring to Unsworth as “pedo guy” was not a direct accusation of pedophilia.
“‘Pedo guy’ was a common insult used in South Africa when I was growing up,” Musk wrote. “It is synonymous with ‘creepy old man’ and is used to insult a person’s appearance and demeanor, not accuse a person of acts of pedophilia.”
“I did not intend to accuse Mr. Unsworth of engaging in acts of pedophilia,” he continued. “In response to his insults in the CNN interview, I meant to insult him back by expressing my opinion that he seemed like a creepy old man.”
The fact that Musk is arguing he was expressing his opinion is important in this context because under the First Amendment, opinions are usually protected speech and not considered defamatory.
The documents also included Musk’s deposition, where he talks more in-depth about the “pedo guy” tweet.
In the deposition, Musk said he sent BuzzFeed the email because he was worried it could turn into a Jeffrey Epstein situation, referring to the wealthy financier who was accused of sexually assaulting dozens of young women, including many underage girls.
“What if we have another Jeffrey Epstein on our hands?” he said. “And what if he uses whatever celebrity he gains from this cave rescue to shield his bad deeds? This would be terrible.”
Musk’s Epstein argument might become problematic. First of all, he made the statements to BuzzFeed before the new allegations surfaced, which some have argued proves he just is using current news to frame Unsworth in a certain way, and that he did not actually consider Epstein at all.
That argument is also furthered by the fact that it has been reported that Musk had attended several events with Epstein, all of which were after Epstein pleaded guilty to soliciting prostitution from an underage girl in 2008.
Notably, Musk also said in the filings that he paid a private investigator more than $50,000 to investigate Unsworth after receiving an unsolicited email from the PI in August 2018.
In the documents, Musk says that the investigator: “reported that Mr. Unsworth met and began a relationship with his alleged Thai wife when she around twelve years old.”
He also added that the investigator “reported that Mr. Unsworth associated with Europeans who engage in improper sexual conduct in Thailand,” and that he “learned that Mr. Unsworth frequented Pattaya Beach which is well known for prostitution and sex tourism, and that Mr. Unsworth was unpopular at the rescue site because other rescue workers thought that he was ‘creepy.’”
Musk goes on to say this was the basis for the comments he made in his email to BuzzFeed.
“I did not authorize Mr. Mac or BuzzFeed to publish the contents of the email nor did I intend or expect that they would,” he said. “Especially without first independently verifying and confirming its information.”
He later added that he gave the information to Mac “so that BuzzFeed could conduct its own investigation into Mr. Unsworth and corroborate the information.”
Musk’s lawyers even admitted in the court filings that the private investigator’s findings “lacked solid evidence of Mr. Unsworth’s behavior.”
Following the release of the court documents, Unsworth’s lawyer gave a statement to BuzzFeed condemning the Musk’s defense.
“The motion filed by Elon Musk today is a disgusting and transparent effort to continue falsely smearing Vernon Unsworth without any credible or verified supporting evidence,” the lawyer said.
“Mr. Unsworth’s opposition to Musk’s motion will reveal the whole truth of Musk’s actions and the falsity of his public statements and his motion with respect to Mr. Unsworth will be exposed.”
See what others are saying: (BuzzFeed News) (The Washington Post) (Business Insider)
Controversy, Racism, and Genius Kids?! How One Sperm Bank Changed Everything…
The Repository for Germinal Choice is the most controversial sperm bank in U.S. history. While it was operational some people believed this bank was racist and they even compared the companies goals to Nazi eugenic practices. But even though this sperm bank was highly controversial, it also completely changed the sperm bank industry.
So check out our video for the full story on how this controversial sperm bank would go on to shape an entire industry.