Connect with us


Heroes Emerge From Tragedy in New Zealand, Ardern Visits Christchurch

A terrorist attack claimed 50 lives at two New Zealand mosques and left dozens of others injured. One woman helped victims during the attack and one man tried to stop the gunman. In the days since, the community has rallied together to show support for the victims, survivors, and their families. Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern […]



  • A terrorist attack claimed 50 lives at two New Zealand mosques and left dozens of others injured.
  • One woman helped victims during the attack and one man tried to stop the gunman.
  • In the days since, the community has rallied together to show support for the victims, survivors, and their families.
  • Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern visited the affected community and plans to tighten the country’s gun control laws.

Woman Treats Wounds in Her Car

After 50 people were killed and 50 others were injured in attacks at two mosques in Christchurch, New Zealand, the community is rallying together and thanking heroes who helped during the tragedy.

The Linwood Islamic Center and Al Noor Mosque were the targets of shootings on Friday. It is the worst shooting mass shooting in the country’s history.

One woman, Jill Keats, was driving when the shooting happened. Two bullets barely missed her car, and she stopped driving. When she saw that someone near her had been shot, she got out of her car to help him.

“The poor bugger lying on the verge had been shot in the back,” Keats told BBC. “And we opened my passenger’s door, my driver’s door, and opened up the back as well to give us some protection. And he had a first aid kit, and he crouched and ran all the way back to get it.”

The victim then lifted his shirt and dressed the wound, while she applied pressure. Another witness ended up helping the two.

“And a nice Muslim guy came and gave me some help as well,” Keats added. “Because you have to put a lot of pressure on, and my poor old hands were shaking hard. I was scared  wouldn’t be able to do a good job.”

Man Fights Back

Another man who was inside one of the mosques attacked is being hailed as a hero for fighting back against the gunman.

When Abdul Aziz realized someone with a gun was approaching, he grabbed a credit card machine to use as a weapon. When the gunman went to grab more ammunition from his car, Aziz chucked the machine at him.

Aziz also picked up a gun the shooter had dropped. When he tried to shoot it, it was empty, so he threw it at the car window.

“I just got that gun and throw it at the window like an arrow,” Aziz said. “And I blast his window. And he probably thought I shot him or something.”

“He just drove off,” he added.

Community Comes Together

Many people in New Zealand are also honoring the victims and supporting their families, and the survivors. The Royal Botanical Garden, which is about the halfway point between the Linwood and Al Noor, is filled with flowers and cards.

View this post on Instagram

Taken by one of my brothers in Christchurch tonight???

A post shared by Chris Taylor ?? ( on

On Sunday, over 12,000 people attended a vigil in Wellington, and more vigils are being planned throughout New Zealand. Others are helping out by donating food to Hagley College, which is being used as a community center for families impacted by the shooting.

Prime Minister Ardern Reaches Out

New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern condemned the views behind the attack in a Friday press conference.

“It is clear that this can only be described as a terrorist attack,” Arden said.
“These are people who I would describe as having extremist views. Views that have no place in New Zealand, and in fact, have no place in the world.”

Over the weekend, Ardern went to Christchurch to visit the victims, survivors, and their family members. She also said that funeral costs for the fifty people who lost their lives would be covered, regardless of their immigration status.

Gun control reform is also a priority for Ardern, who said that there will be changes to New Zealand’s gun laws within the next ten days. While it is not yet known what specifically will change, the cabinet has agreed to tighten laws.

How to Help

The New Zealand Council of Victim Support Groups made a crowdfunding page at Give a Little. There is also a Launchgood page that is taking crowd-funded donations. The funds from both of these will be given to support those affected, including the victim’s families.

Editors Note: At Rogue Rocket, we make it a point to not include the names and pictures of mass murders or suspected mass murderers who may have been seeking attention or infamy.


U.K. Court Rules Julian Assange Can Be Extradited to U.S.



The judgment overrules a lower court decision that blocked the WikiLeaks founder’s extradition on the grounds that his mental health was not stable enough to weather harsh conditions in the American prison system if convicted.

New Developments in Assange Extradition Battle

A British court ruled Friday that WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange can be extradited to the United States to face charges of violating the Espionage Act that could land him in prison for decades.

Prosecutors in the U.S. have accused Assange of conspiring with former army intelligence analyst Chelsea Manning in 2010 to hack into a Department of Defense computer network and access thousands of military and diplomatic records on the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.

The information obtained in the hack was later published by WikiLeaks in 2010 and 2011, a move U.S. authorities allege put lives in danger.

In addition to a charge of computer misuse, Assange has also been indicted on 17 espionage charges. Collectively, the charges carry a maximum prison sentence of 175 years.

The Friday decision from the High Court overturns a lower court ruling in January, which found that Assange’s mental health was too fragile for the harsh environment he could face in the U.S. prison system if convicted.

Notably, the January ruling did not determine whether or not Assange was guilty. In fact, District Judge Vanessa Baraitser explicitly rejected the defense’s arguments that the charges against him were politically motivated and that he should be protected under freedom of press.

However, she agreed that the defense had provided compelling evidence that Assange suffers from severe depression and that the conditions he could face in the U.S. prison system were “such that it would be oppressive to extradite him to the United States of America.”

The U.S. appealed the ruling, arguing that Assange’s mental health should not be a barrier to extradition and that the psychiatrist who examined him had been biased. 

In October, the Biden administration vowed that if Assange were to be convicted, he would not be placed in the highest-security U.S. prison or immediately sent to solitary confinement. Officials also said that the native Australian would be eligible to serve his sentence in his home country.

High Court Ruling

The High Court agreed with the administration’s arguments in its ruling, arguing that the American’s assurances regarding the conditions of Assange’s potential incarceration were “sufficient.” 

“There is no reason why this court should not accept the assurances as meaning what they say,” the ruling stated. “There is no basis for assuming that the USA has not given the assurances in good faith.”

Assange’s fiancé, Stella Moris, said in a statement that his legal team would appeal the decision to the British Supreme Court at the “earliest possible moment,” referring to the judgment as a “grave miscarriage of justice.”

The Supreme Court will now decide whether or not to hear the case based on if it believes the matter involves a point of law “of general public importance.” That decision may take weeks or even months.

If the U.K. Supreme Court court objects to hearing Assange’s appeal, he could ask the European Court of Human Rights to stay the extradition — a move that could set in motion another lengthy legal battle in the already drawn-out process.

Assange and his supporters claim he was acting as an investigative journalist when he published the classified military cables. They argue that the possibility of his extradition and prosecution represent serious threats to press freedoms in the U.S.

U.S. prosecutors dispute that Assange acted as a journalist, claiming that he encouraged illegal hacking for personal reasons.

See what others are saying: (The New York Times) (NPR) (The Washington Post)

Continue Reading


Early Data Indicates Omicron is More Transmissible But Less Severe



The studies come as Pfizer and BioNTech claim that preliminary research shows a third shot of their COVID vaccine appears to provide sufficient protection against the new variant, but two doses alone may not.

More Information About Omicron

Several preliminary studies published in recent days appear to show that the new omicron COVID-19 variant may be more transmissible but less severe than previous strains.

One recent, un-peer-reviewed study by a Japanese scientist who advises the country’s health ministry found that omicron is four times more transmissible in its initial stage than delta was.

Preliminary information in countries hit hard by omicron also indicates high transmissibility. In South Africa —  where the variant was first detected and is already the dominant strain — new COVID cases have more than doubled over the last week.

Health officials in the U.K. said omicron cases are doubling every two or three days, and they expect the strain to become dominant in the country in a matter of weeks.

In a statement Wednesday, World Health Organization Director Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said that while early data does seem to show high transmissibility, it also indicates that omicron causes more mild cases than delta.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevent Director Rochelle Walensky echoed that sentiment, telling reporters that of the 40 known omicron cases in the U.S. as of Wednesday, nearly all of them were mild. One person has been hospitalized so far and none have died.

Studies on Vaccine Efficacy 

Other recent studies have shown that current COVID vaccines are effective at preventing severe illness and death in omicron patients, and boosters provide at least some added protection.

On Wednesday, Pfizer and BioNTech announced that laboratory tests have shown a third dose of their COVID-19 vaccine appears to provide sufficient protection against the omicron variant, though two doses may not.

According to the companies, researchers saw a 25-fold reduction in neutralizing antibodies for omicron compared to other strains of the virus for people who had just two Pfizer doses. 

By contrast, samples from people one month after they had received a Pfizer booster presented neutralizing antibodies against omicron that were comparable to those seen against previous variants after two doses.

Still, Pfizer’s chief executive also told reporters later in the day that omicron could increase the likelihood that people might need a fourth dose earlier than previously expected, which he had initially said was 12 months after the third shot.

Notably, the Pfizer research has not yet been peer-reviewed, and it remains unclear how omicron will operate outside a lab, but other studies have had similar findings.

See what others are saying: (The New York Times) (Bloomberg) (NBC News)

Continue Reading


40 Camels Disqualified From Beauty Contest After Breeders Inject Their Faces With Botox



The animals were barred from competing for $66 million in prizes at this year’s King Abdulaziz Camel Festival in Saudi Arabia.

Camels Booted From Beauty Contest

More than 40 camels were disqualified from a beauty contest in Saudi Arabia this week after judges found artificial enhancements in their faces, marking the biggest crackdown on contestants in the competition to date.

The animals were competing for $66 million in prizes at the King Abdulaziz Camel Festival, a month-long event that is estimated to include around 33,000 camels.

However, according to The Guardian, they were forced out of the contest when authorities found that breeders had “stretched out the lips and noses of the camels, used hormones to boost the animals’ muscles, injected heads and lips with Botox to make them bigger, inflated body parts with rubber bands, and used fillers to relax their faces.”

Those types of alterations are banned since judges look at the contestant’s heads, necks, humps, posture, and other features when evaluating them.

An announcement from the state-linked Saudi Press Agency said officials used “specialized and advanced” technology to detect tampering.

“The club is keen to halt all acts of tampering and deception in the beautification of camels,” the SPA report added before warning that organizers would “impose strict penalties on manipulators.”

While it’s unclear what that actually entails, this isn’t the first time people have tried to cheat in this way.

In 2018, 12 camels were similarly disqualified from the competition for injections in their noses, lips, and jaw.

See what others are saying: (Insider) (The Guardian) (ABC News)

Continue Reading